When it comes to leveling and raising concrete slabs, there are two main options available: polymer slab jacking and mud jacking. But which option is better, more cost-effective and will last the longest? Many factors need to be considered when deciding which method of slab lifting to choose. In this blog post, we’ll explore the differences between polymer slab jacking vs. mud jacking so that you can make an informed decision about how to repair or level your sunken driveway, patio or walkway.
Production Savings: Polymer Injection is 4 to 8 times faster than traditional methods and requires smaller crews.
Traffic Control Savings: Total time required for closure is reduced 4 to 1 because of production savings. Delay time before traffic may return to treated roadway after completion of injection is approximately 15 minutes.
Life Cycle Savings: The Polymer Injection process has a minimum 4 to 1 advantage over conventional mud jacking’s life span of 1 to 2 years with a typical polymer 10 year warranty against shrinkage and deterioration.
CST Polymer Injection | Traditional Mudjacking | |
---|---|---|
PRESSURE OF INJECTION | Low Pressure | High Pressure |
HOW IT LIFTS | Chemical reaction creates expansion of polymer that lifts the slab. | Fluid or Hydraulic pressure of grout lifts the slab. |
CURE TIME | Expands in less than one minute and reaches 90% strength within 15 minutes. | Requires additional cure time of 4 hours or more to complete hydration. |
ACCURACY OF LIFT | Surgical precision lift to desired elevation is accomplished. | An “over-lift” is necessary to compensate for water loss in the grout as it cures. |
FOOTPRINT/PROPERTY IMPACT | Small 5/8” holes, about the size of a penny, are drilled to inject polymer with no damage to existing concrete slab. | Large 2 to 3 inch holes are drilled to inject high pressure grout. This can compromise the concrete causing breakout at the bottom of the slab. |
LIFECYCLE OF REPAIR | Permanent lift & stabilization is standard. Polymer material is guaranteed for 10 years. | Longevity of lift/repairs is expected to last for approximately 1 year. University of Illinois Study 1985-1989. |
COST IMPACT | Savings over tear out and replace. One time cost. | Ongoing cost due to need for rework/repair of same area. |
Clearly, the use of polymer injection has many advantages over mud jacking. When it comes to production and traffic control savings, the polymer injection method has a clear 4 to 1 advantage. Additionally, it also boasts a longer lifecycle of 10 years with a possible warranty against shrinkage and deterioration – far surpassing conventional methods. As such, polymer injection should be seriously considered for those looking for efficient and long-term slab jacking capabilities. Ultimately, this is an investment that pays off in time saved, in the quality of the product produced, and in the prevention of costly repairs down the line. In short, those committed to saving both money and time would do well to consider this option as a viable alternative to mud jacking.