Skip to content

303-306-9191

CST-Logo-Color-01
  • Services
  • Case Studies
  • Technologies
  • About Us
Free Consultation

Commercial

Commercial Foundation Repair
Concrete Slab Lifting and Leveling
Increased Load Bearing Capacity
Rocking Slab Stabilization & Undersealing
Soil Densification & Recompaction
Trip Hazard Elimination
Void Fill

Industrial

Carbon Fiber Structural Reinforcement
Grout Curtain Cutoff Wall
Industrial Concrete Lifting & Leveling
Industrial Corrugated Metal Pipe Repair
Industrial Foundation Repair
Tank Equipment & Pad Leveling

Residential

Driveway and Sidewalk Lifting & Leveling
Expansive Clay Soil Treatment
Floor Slab Leveling
Residential Foundation Repair
Swimming Pool and Deck Lifting
Soil Compaction & Void Fill

Transportation

Airport and Taxiway Pavement Lifting & Leveling
Bridge Approach Lifting
Concrete & Asphalt Pavement Lifting
Corrugated Metal Pipe Repair for Transportation Projects
Frost Heave Mitigation
Infiltration Mitigation
Infrastructure and Joint Sealing
Railroad Crossing Void Lift & Slab Fill
Subgrade Soil Stabilization and Densification
Our Engineering Partners
Blog & News
Meet Our Team
Free Consultation
Search
Close this search box.

Blog

Analysis of Polymer Slab Jacking vs. Mud Jacking

We are often asked about the differences between mud jacking and the use of CST's polymers for slab jacking. In this post, we discuss the key differences are between cure time, lift accuracy, footprint and lifecycle.
  • April 1, 2016

When it comes to leveling and raising concrete slabs, there are two main options available: polymer slab jacking and mud jacking. But which option is better, more cost-effective and will last the longest? Many factors need to be considered when deciding which method of slab lifting to choose. In this blog post, we’ll explore the differences between polymer slab jacking vs. mud jacking so that you can make an informed decision about how to repair or level your sunken driveway, patio or walkway.

Production Savings:  Polymer Injection is 4 to 8 times faster than traditional methods and requires smaller crews.

Traffic Control Savings:  Total time required for closure is reduced 4 to 1 because of production savings.  Delay time before traffic may return to treated roadway after completion of injection is approximately 15 minutes.

Life Cycle Savings:  The Polymer Injection process has a minimum 4 to 1 advantage over conventional mud jacking’s life span of 1 to 2 years with a typical polymer 10 year warranty against shrinkage and deterioration.

CST Polymer Injection Traditional Mudjacking
PRESSURE OF INJECTION Low Pressure High Pressure
HOW IT LIFTS Chemical reaction creates expansion of polymer that lifts the slab. Fluid or Hydraulic pressure of grout lifts the slab.
CURE TIME Expands in less than one minute and reaches 90% strength within 15 minutes. Requires additional cure time of 4 hours or more to complete hydration.
ACCURACY OF LIFT Surgical precision lift to desired elevation is accomplished. An “over-lift” is necessary to compensate for water loss in the grout as it cures.
FOOTPRINT/PROPERTY IMPACT Small 5/8” holes, about the size of a penny, are drilled to inject polymer with no damage to existing concrete slab. Large 2 to 3 inch holes are drilled to inject high pressure grout. This can compromise the concrete causing breakout at the bottom of the slab.
LIFECYCLE OF REPAIR Permanent lift & stabilization is standard. Polymer material is guaranteed for 10 years. Longevity of lift/repairs is expected to last for approximately 1 year. University of Illinois Study 1985-1989.
COST IMPACT Savings over tear out and replace. One time cost. Ongoing cost due to need for rework/repair of same area.

Clearly, the use of polymer injection has many advantages over mud jacking. When it comes to production and traffic control savings, the polymer injection method has a clear 4 to 1 advantage. Additionally, it also boasts a longer lifecycle of 10 years with a possible warranty against shrinkage and deterioration – far surpassing conventional methods. As such, polymer injection should be seriously considered for those looking for efficient and long-term slab jacking capabilities. Ultimately, this is an investment that pays off in time saved, in the quality of the product produced, and in the prevention of costly repairs down the line. In short, those committed to saving both money and time would do well to consider this option as a viable alternative to mud jacking.

Next Post
Enjoy this article? Here are some more you might like.
Loading...

Concrete Raising with Foam Jacking

Read More

A Summary of CST Applications

Read More

Concrete Stabilization Technologies, inc.

  • info@cststabilization.com
  • Open Weekdays 9am - 5pm MST
  • 303-306-9191
Get In Touch

INdustries We Serve

  • Commercial
  • Industrial
  • Residential
  • Transportation
  • Commercial
  • Industrial
  • Residential
  • Transportation

How We Help

  • Read Our Case Studies
  • Technologies We Use
  • Read Our Case Studies
  • Technologies We Use

our company

  • Our Team
  • Our Engineering Partners
  • News
  • Careers
  • Our Team
  • Our Engineering Partners
  • News
  • Careers

Areas We Serve

  • Colorado
  • Colorado Springs
  • Denver
  • Utah
  • Salt Lake City
  • Wyoming
  • Montana
  • Colorado
  • Colorado Springs
  • Denver
  • Utah
  • Salt Lake City
  • Wyoming
  • Montana

Concrete Stabilization Technologies, Inc. Ⓒ 2023 | All Rights Are Reserved

Designed and Developed by GEOCMO